Total Pageviews
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Action Research Template
- A title for your paper
- Introduction Which
Shows why this study is neede
Argues for significance of the topic
Presents the scope of analysis
Explains the study questions you expected to answer
- Methodology that
Gives details of reasoning for choosing the resources to investigate
Clarifies on the actions to be taken to analyze the materials
Organizes the criteria for assessment of the findings
- Analysis and Discussion which
Organize theories by subtopic
Group resources by notions in preferences to individual units
List research findings
Connect findings with references which sustain them
Classify and analyze the results
Methodology answer your study questions
- Conclusion that
Offer prospect investigations
TEACHER'S WORK: Report of Research Project Completed
TEACHER'S WORK: Report of Research Project Completed: Title: Improving Reading Comprehension Trough the Use of Higher Order Thinking Activities Researcher: Mr. Noel...
Income Generating Project Proposal (Format)
I - PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION
1. Project Title
2. Proponent
3. Address/Project site
4. Contact Persons
5. Number of Beneficiaries
6. Total Project Cost
7. Source of Funds
II - RATIONALE
III -PROJECT OBJECTIVES
General
Specific
IV-PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief)
V -MECHANICS AND IMPLEMENTATION(Pre, During and Post)
VI-EXPECTED OUTPUT
Production Capacity and expected outputs
Projected summary of Gross Sale of Products
VII- WORKPLAN OF ACTIVITIES (Can be presented in table)
Major Activities
Person Responsible
Time frame or duration(may be divided by quarter) can be presented in a table or ghant chart
VIII- BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
e.g For production Project(particulat item, Period and Cost)
For Equiptment, Supplies, Tools and Implements (Particulat Item, Description and Costs)
For Administrative Expenses(Particulars - Monitoring and Evaluation and Training on Financial Record Keeping)
IX - PROJECT OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION
A. Market
Product Description
Target Market
Price and Pricing(prevailing market price)
Terms of Sale(wholesale, retail, direct consumers)
Projected Sale Volume
B. Technical
Project Location
Production capacity and expected output
Technical Production Processes
C. Organizational and Management
Project Organization and Management Structure
D. Financial
Capital Requirement
Source of Funds
Investment Cost
Projected Income Statement
X - MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Prepared by:
__________________
Proponent
NOTED:
_______________ __________________
School Head PSDS
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
______________________ ____________________
Subject Area Concerned Area Supervisor
APPROVED:
________________________________
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
1. Project Title
2. Proponent
3. Address/Project site
4. Contact Persons
5. Number of Beneficiaries
6. Total Project Cost
7. Source of Funds
II - RATIONALE
III -PROJECT OBJECTIVES
General
Specific
IV-PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief)
V -MECHANICS AND IMPLEMENTATION(Pre, During and Post)
VI-EXPECTED OUTPUT
Production Capacity and expected outputs
Projected summary of Gross Sale of Products
VII- WORKPLAN OF ACTIVITIES (Can be presented in table)
Major Activities
Person Responsible
Time frame or duration(may be divided by quarter) can be presented in a table or ghant chart
VIII- BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
e.g For production Project(particulat item, Period and Cost)
For Equiptment, Supplies, Tools and Implements (Particulat Item, Description and Costs)
For Administrative Expenses(Particulars - Monitoring and Evaluation and Training on Financial Record Keeping)
IX - PROJECT OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION
A. Market
Product Description
Target Market
Price and Pricing(prevailing market price)
Terms of Sale(wholesale, retail, direct consumers)
Projected Sale Volume
B. Technical
Project Location
Production capacity and expected output
Technical Production Processes
C. Organizational and Management
Project Organization and Management Structure
D. Financial
Capital Requirement
Source of Funds
Investment Cost
Projected Income Statement
X - MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Prepared by:
__________________
Proponent
NOTED:
_______________ __________________
School Head PSDS
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
______________________ ____________________
Subject Area Concerned Area Supervisor
APPROVED:
________________________________
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Report of Research Project Completed
Title: Improving Reading Comprehension Trough the Use of Higher Order Thinking Activities
Researcher:
Mr. Noel R. Dauran, MaEd
Master Teacher 1
Baya Elem. School
Baya, Ragay, Camarines Sur
ABSTRACT:
This asction research project was conducted to improve reading comprehension of grade three pupils of Baya Elementary School, Ragay District, Division of Camarines Sur for the school year 2011 - 2012. The researcher intends to improve the reading comprehension by using the higher order thinking skill such as predicting, making connections, visualizing, inferring, questioning and summarizing. In his classroom the researcher modeled these strategies through the think aloud process and graphic organizers. This is fallowed by the pupils using these strategies through the whole class, small group, and independent practice.
The experimental one-shot case method of Research was utilized in which the treatment was the instruction of Reading Strategies. Documentary analysis was also employed since the results of the Phil-Iri and Metacomprehension Strategy Index were used as the source of data.
The researcher gatherd information prior to implementing the strategy interventions. The Metacomprehension Strategy Index indicated a lack of pupil's knowledge of strategies to use before, during, and after reading. The Phil-Iri given to the grade III pupils identified 9 out of the 16 pupils below target level.
The information gathered by the researcher after the intervention had been modeled and practiced showed improvement with the grade III pupils. The post intervention scores for the Metacomprehension Strategy Index showed a significant increase in pupil's knowledge of the reading comprehension strategies. The Phil- Iri post intervention scores indicates only 2 of the 49 pupils of the grade III pupils remained non reader . The table on Level of Reading comprehension it shows that along frustration Level, indicated a decrease of 32.65%, under Instructional indicated an increased of 32.65% and 6.13% for Independent Level.
PURPOSE:
1. To improve the reading comprehension of grade three pupils.
2. To increase the performance level of grade III pupils in the PHIL - IRI
3. Prepare the grade III pupils for the National Achievement Test
4. Improve pupil's performance in English and further enhance the teacher-facilitator teaching competencies
Design/Methodology
A. Methodology
This study employ the pre-experimental one-shot case study. According to De Jesus the pre-experimental one shot case study is a desidn in which a single group is only studied once, subsequent to a treatment is the instruction of reading strategies. It is important to teach the strategies by naming the strategy and how it should be used, modeling through think aloud process, group practice and independent use of the strategy.
Parental consent was obtained for this research project during the last week of August. To show evidence of a problem in reading comprehension the researcher orally surveyed his grade III pupils using the Metacomprehension Strategy Index.During the first week of September, the researcher administered this oral survey to his pupils. The survey measured each student awareness of the strategies used in the reading process. The researcher reads one part of the survey per day for three consecutive days. This tool was used to measure the pupil's awareness of their strategic reading process before the strategies were introduced.
The second tool used was the Phil- Iri administered to the pupils in the third grade classroom in the first week of July, 2011. This tool is used to determine student growth in reading comprehension.
The teacher observation checklist was used by the researcher to gather data throughout the intervention. Beginning in October 2011, once a month , the researcher used checklist to observe which reading comprehension strategies were being used by the pupils in small groups.This tool provide information of changes on how well his pupils understand and use reading comprehension strategies over time.
B. Sampling Design:
Purposive sampling was employed in selecting pupils-respondent of the study. The pupils who were selected were enrolled in the grade III class for the school year 2011 - 2012.
Parental consent was obtained for this research project during the last week of August. To show evidence of a problem in reading comprehension the researcher orally surveyed his grade III pupils using the Metacomprehension Strategy Index.During the first week of September, the researcher administered this oral survey to his pupils. The survey measured each student awareness of the strategies used in the reading process. The researcher reads one part of the survey per day for three consecutive days. This tool was used to measure the pupil's awareness of their strategic reading process before the strategies were introduced.
The second tool used was the Phil- Iri administered to the pupils in the third grade classroom in the first week of July, 2011. This tool is used to determine student growth in reading comprehension.
The teacher observation checklist was used by the researcher to gather data throughout the intervention. Beginning in October 2011, once a month , the researcher used checklist to observe which reading comprehension strategies were being used by the pupils in small groups.This tool provide information of changes on how well his pupils understand and use reading comprehension strategies over time.
B. Sampling Design:
Purposive sampling was employed in selecting pupils-respondent of the study. The pupils who were selected were enrolled in the grade III class for the school year 2011 - 2012.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)